REAL WAR STORY PRO
REAL WAR STORY FREE

Yet once he left the arena, a gladiator seemed almost harmless, even if he had taken up arms in revolt.

REAL WAR STORY PRO

Like many a pro athlete, Spartacus was feared for the same reason he was adored: he was dangerous. The beasts were supposed to growl back at them it made a better show. Whenever they went to the games the Romans took a walk on the wild side. To the Romans, a gladiator was not just an athlete or even a warrior: he was holy. But in their mercy, as far as the Romans were concerned, they gave Spartacus another chance. He had lost the chance that the army had given him (again, that is, from the Roman point of view). Then, whether through bad behavior or bad luck, he ended up a slave. From their point of view, the Romans had offered Spartacus the hand of civilization by letting him into the auxiliary units of their army. As a former allied soldier, he was pathetic. For the Romans, gladiators were to be fed, trained, cheered, adored, ogled, bedded, buried, and even, occasionally, freed, but, never, never to be treated as equals.Īs a slave and a Thracian barbarian, Spartacus was despicable to Romans. Fear and scorn, hatred and admiration, indifference and obsession - they were all there. Doublethink runs like a red thread through Roman attitudes toward Spartacus. Or so the Romans told themselves, although the stubborn resistance of Sicily's slaves in two revolts (135-132 and 104-100 b.c.) should have taught them otherwise.Īnd then there were the gladiators and their leader. In revolt slaves were a nuisance but not a major problem.

REAL WAR STORY FREE

For slaves to behave like free men was strictly for the Saturnalia, an annual celebration featuring role reversal - as a Roman officer once remarked in disgust when his men had to fight freed slaves. For slaves to behave courageously was against nature. Their servile nature, said one contemporary, made slaves cruel, greedy, violent, and fanatical while denying them nobility or generosity of spirit. It was a serious matter but not organized war ( bellum, in Latin).Īs we know, Romans looked down on slaves. It was, to quote Caesar, 'a tumultus of slaves.' A tumultus was a sudden outbreak of violence requiring an emergency response. The news from Capua was digested, analyzed, and classified. Apparently the Romans felt more confident in 73 than in 104. But the first revolt had been led by a Roman citizen who was a knight, no less, while the latest uprising was the work of barbarians and slaves. Glaber led a force slightly smaller than the one sent against the rebels of 104 b.c.: three thousand men instead of 4,400 and, so far as we know, no cavalry. His obscurity was another sign of how little attention Rome gave Spartacus. He was a plebeian with probably at most a distant link to the more famous members of the Claudius clan. He never rose to the consulate and he had no known descendants. They were men of great expectations, since the praetors were the second highest-ranking of the annually elected public officials in Rome only the two consuls stood higher. He was one of eight praetors that year, each of them at least thirty-nine years old, and each elected to an annual term. The senators chose Caius Claudius Glaber to send against Spartacus. But in 73 b.c., the senators enjoyed a period of power. Once rare, those challenges had become more frequent.

They were the oligarchy that ran Rome, except for those occasions when they were challenged by a general like Marius or Sulla. They had automatically become senators, without election, after holding high public office, and they served for life. Senators were all very wealthy men, and almost all members of a few elite families. So the obvious policy in 73 was to send in the praetor. Capua had seen a slave revolt before, in 104 b.c., which had been crushed by barely the number of troops in a single legion - four thousand infantry and four hundred cavalry, for a total of 4,400 men - led by a praetor, a leading Roman public official. Given the big picture, the gladiators' revolt might have seemed minor. In Crete, Antony got ready to sail out against pirates attacking Roman shipping. In the Balkans, Gaius Scribonius Curio was the first Roman general, along with his legion, to see the Danube River. In Asia Minor, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, the consul's brother, began an invasion of the homeland of King Mithridates, who had fought Rome on and off for fifteen years. In Spain, Pompey ground down the renegade Roman commander Sertorius by taking out his strongholds one by one. In 73 b.c., six hundred and eighty-one years after the founding of the city of Rome, during the consulship of Lucullus (Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus) and Cassius (Gaius Cassius Longinus), the republic was fighting wars at both ends of the Mediterranean.

Real war story